Friday, June 10, 2011

Bookish Questions: Series or Stand-Alones?


Nowadays it seems like every single book I read is part of a series. Its kind of insane. And to be honest I don't know how I feel about it.

This seems to be most prevalent in the dystopian/fantasy/adventure genres. Lately it seems like there are hardly any stand-alone novels coming out of these genres.

Now don't get me wrong. I love a good series like any other person. The Hunger Games? LOVE. Harry Potter? LOVE. But does every single book that comes out that isn't a contemporary HAVE to be apart of a series?

I guess my biggest gripe with series is that sometimes they just go on and on. Like Manga. I mean there are 48 volumes of Naruto in Part 1. And that's only Part 1!!!! I honestly don't know how people can just keep reading them. Don't they get boring after awhile? :P

Another thing for me is that sometimes I'll read a book thinking its a stand-alone novel, and then I get to the end and I realize its the first in a series and it feels like I then have to  read the rest of the books. Especially if there is a cliff hanger. I don't have any problem with this if the book is great! But if the book is only so so? Then its like "gosh now I HAVE to read the sequel." (I know, I know, I don't really HAVE to read it but my bookish OCD starts to kick in.....)

I have now come to discover that if I realize I a new book is part of a series, then that factors into whether or not I decide to read it. I have to think: Do I really want to get sucked into another series? Does this really seem like a series I would enjoy reading, or will I possibly regret reading this?

So what are your guys' thoughts on this? Do you wish there were more stand-alone novels or do you like how popular series are these days? And does the fact that a book is the first in a series play a part in whether or not you decide to read it?

(oh and sorry if this post sounds a little like a rant. I mean no offense to any authors who are writing a series or anyone else for that matter. Really, I don't!!!)

Julia :)

4 comments:

  1. I'm all for stand-alone novels! I like to read books in order and if a series is too far along I won't buy the latest book because I know I will never get all the earlier ones. I don't mind a trilogy but I can't deal with a long series. With a stand-alone novel I can read it and then go on to something else without worrying that I missed something or will miss something in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I feel the same as you about series! There is nothing, though, as good as a stand-alone, all contained, single novel. The best stand-alones are those that end, and make you wish that they had kept going, and have you wondering about what could have been!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh my gosh, my friends and I talk about this all the time! Most books are only series because publishers make more money if the book is good because you *have* to read the next book if there is a cliffhanger. Sigh.

    I like series. I love being able to read more of characters I fall in love with. I also love talking about the series with my friends. What I hate is that in some series the story just goes on and on and on and the characters get nowhere.

    I do think there are not enough stand alones, though. I love reading Cyn Balog's novels and they are all stand alone.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I completely agree!

    I like it when authors write a novel and are signed on for another one due to rave reviews or a cliffhanger at the end, rather than signing a contract for a 5-part book series. It's tedious to keep reading after a while. I'll admit that I gave up on House of Night after the 3rd one when I heard there'd be 12 of them. That's ridiculous!

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...